Hedge Fund Communications III
Posted by Paul Damon on Fri, Nov 07, 2008 @ 06:22 AM
As this blog has noted before, in times of high performance hedge funds
could get away with their trademark silence. In today's market, funds
are quickly discovering how necessary transparency and disclosure to
both investors and the media truly is.
A positive example of proactive communications came from Blue Mountain
Capital Management (BMCM). From a communications angle, BMCM did two
things right this week:
1.In the face of unprecedented outflows, BMCM Founder and CEO Andrew
Feldstein wrote a letter to investors outlining revised terms for their
funds. Striking a quid pro quo, investors agreeing by November 11th to
hold their money with BMCM through 2009 will pay lower fees through
2010. This was a clear way to explain to investors that the stability
of capital is directly correlated to both the stability of the fund and
investor returns in these times of volatility. To be sure, BMCM is only
down 2.4% in 2008. Investors - many fund of hedge funds and pensions -
pulling out of performers such as BMCM are reacting to both irrational
fear and the need to liquidate holdings to post collateral and hold cash.
With BMCM, this activity is shown to be indiscriminate. Clearly a large
and stable fund such as BMCM deserves better than to have 25% of its
capital withdrawn by investors.
2. BMCM agreed to interview with WSJ during these pressing times.
Instead of hiding and fanning media suspicion over the root of such
extensive withdrawal requests, i.e. projected dire performance through
Q4, CEO Feldstein spoke with the WSJ, discussing pandemic investor fear
and the cycle of withdrawal while reassuring the health of the fund and
the dependable cash positions held currently.
By taking these actions BMCM is effectively fighting back what has been a
self prophetic cycle of fire-drill selling amongst the investment
community, driving down capital, prices and sentiment and resulting in
a lack of will to provide the capital and credit our global economy
needs to function.